French language Q&A Forum
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
13,703 questions • 29,355 answers • 835,433 learners
Questions answered by our learning community with help from expert French teachers
13,703 questions • 29,355 answers • 835,433 learners
Apparaître follows the same pattern as connaître for the passé composé, (aître -> u), so not an exception. See - https://conjugator.reverso.net/conjugation-rules-model-french/model-conna%C3%AEtre.html
EXCEPTIONS :
- apparaître (to appear, come to be) and derivativesWhy maison in plural is not maisones since it's female it needs to end with
'' es ''. But instead ends with just '' s '', maisons ?
Help :'(
Dear Aurelie and team
Just wondering if this phrase is supposed to be " et ce n'est pas du tout" I think the "du" is missing in the original.
Sincerely
Una
I am listening to your examples and am not hearing any difference.. is that my lack of discrimination or are they actually the same?
Hi,
The lesson says "[f]or pronunciation reasons, you will use en with masculine countries starting with a vowel". I was wondering if it is also written out in this way or if it is only pronounced this way and the au preposition is maintained for singular masculine countries in writing.
Also, does this rule apply to countries with aux as their preposition? For example, would the aux of États-Unis become en?
Thanks!
what is the meaning of "s'acharner sur/contre" in English? will you please give me some examples?
If a color derives from a real thing or a you have color + a real thing the color adjective never agrees according to the lesson. Therefore, I am confused as to why an example in a quiz marked the following incorrect:
X une chemise bleu marin
I am given : une chemise bleue marine as the correct response
Marin is sailor or seafarer which is a real thing. This lead me to believe there would be no agreement.
Find your French level for FREE
Test your French to the CEFR standard
Find your French level